Subject:
|
Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:43:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4156 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Rafe Donahue wrote:
> is there any restriction on bringing last year's
> modules to this year's Brickfest?
If you have a module, then bring it - old or new. I'm not sure how many new
ones I'll have, especially as one of mine is now a virtual GBC antique, having
been one of the very first modules ever made to the standard. And the others
that will be repeating are the ones that, like that original one, have had by
*far* the most testing.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
| I wonder whether some cause of instability for seemingly well tested modules when they are put into a real GBC is that the specification doesn't specify the speed, or the angle of entry of balls into your input hopper. If your upstream 'test' module (...) (18 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
| (...) This brings me to a question: is there any restriction on bringing last year's modules to this year's Brickfest? On one hand it seems like that could make it even bigger (!) but on the other hand we want some new stuff, right? Thoughts, (...) (18 years ago, 29-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
