To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 25277
25276  |  25278
Subject: 
Re: studless construction practice
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:19:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2225 times
  
   Like the cross-blocks http://peeron.com/inv/parts/653 in various lengths - I
use these all the time it seems.
I guess you mean http://peeron.com/inv/parts/6536 ...

Studless designs are stronger and more rigid.
As to rigid, I *strongly* disagree - I've
yet to see a studless design that rivals a studded frame for rigidity.
Sometimes, this can work to your advantage - a structure with some give is often
more forgiving of stresses than a very rigid one. But if you really *need* a
rigid structure, well... I'm open to being proven wrong here (yet again), but
I've not seen it yet.


I completely agree with Brian. While I do like studless construction (I still
need more time to think and build with them, but the result is more refined), I
use studded beams when I need stiffness. A single studless beam is already much
less rigid than a studded one.

And I have yet to find a way to create a compound long studless beam with good
stiffness and strength. Sandwitching studless beams between plates works rather
well... but it is no longer studless construction!

Philo



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: studless construction practice
 
I've recently got back into technics.. and got a few of the 2004/05 kits... my first impression was: "This is Peg-o... not Lego!" after my first 4 hour session of building the 8436 truck.. my fingers were really sore from inserting so many little (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: studless construction practice
 
(...) Although there is a disadvantage here too. I find fewer spacing options with studless constructions, actually. Integer and half integer spacing is easy, but not 1/3rd integer spacing that I can get with plates. Additionally, very fine spacings (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR