Subject:
|
Re: studless construction practice
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:41:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1894 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Mike Walters wrote:
>
> Kind of a newbie question: Is there a trend toward studless in more than just
> Mindstorms? If so, is the thought that it is mostly because of expiring patents
> or are there other reasons.
>
> If we're going to look for studless practice, are there certain Lego product
> lines that we should be looking at?
Technic has been mostly studless for several years now. Get some of those big
trucks and cranes to get some practice at it, and a supply of parts. Also, some
of the advanced star wars kits are studless technic.
> Also, do we necessarily need to be thinking about building studless? The
> picutres of the slot machine from CES look to me like they use a lot of good old
> fashioned studded bricks.
You can mix them just fine, they are compatible. But you'll at least need to
know studless well enough to attach the sensors, motors, and the NXT.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: studless construction practice
|
| (...) I’m curious about the advantages of studless construction. Steve suggested learning to build without studs here as well: (URL) guess I’m a little unclear on the advantage to using studless beams. All of these components (NXT / motors / (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: studless construction practice
|
| (...) Kind of a newbie question: Is there a trend toward studless in more than just Mindstorms? If so, is the thought that it is mostly because of expiring patents or are there other reasons. If we're going to look for studless practice, are there (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
