Subject:
|
Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:57:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1403 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
>
> > 45 degree angles are not so simple.
>
> They are, depending on how ridgid you need the system to be. Take a 16L beam
> with two 1x2 plates and a 1x2 beam on the end, and pin a second 16L beam at 90°
> to the first. Now you can easily mount an axle at 45° by attaching it to any
> matching holes on the two 16L beams, and attach a third beam to the axle using,
> say, two cross-blocks. It can actually be rather rigid if you don't use long
> axles.
Or, connect it to a technic turntable, so you can rotate it to any angle you
want.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Which you can make rigid by merely using a rack or worm gear, and depending on space - some additional gears to displace the locking mechanism, however there may still be some play in that. OrionRobots (19 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) I'm here - just amazed at the chaos I kicked up :-). Incidently, I've grown to hate those tank tread belts (those, originally, were going to be the conveyor, but they are just too stiff). I've now got more ideas running around in my head as to (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
