Subject:
|
Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:20:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1349 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Tue, August 23, 2005 12:37 pm, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:
> > You could also link the handle holes of the polarity switches with a solid piece
> > (as opposed to a single linking axel through the axel holes). You should be
> > able to get a 45 degree tilt this way also.
>
> Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of
> friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the
> proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction.
>
> Steve
So - tilting one of the switches is probably the best approach.
But I want to know where Brian Davis is. He started this blasted discussion :)
And, Kevin, should I just send you my mailing address so you send me the parts?
:) (BTW - it didn't look pneumatic. What's wrong?) :)
Bryan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Well, given that technic is quantized down to stud or half stud sizes, the solution may not be obvious. The easiest angles to create are due to 3-4-5 triangles. Most of the bent liftarms are bent based on those angles. The tri-blade liftarms (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction. Steve (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
