Subject:
|
Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:49:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1331 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Tue, August 23, 2005 12:37 pm, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:
> > You could also link the handle holes of the polarity switches with a solid piece
> > (as opposed to a single linking axel through the axel holes). You should be
> > able to get a 45 degree tilt this way also.
>
> Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of
> friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the
> proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction.
>
> Steve
I was assuming that handles would not be used, because the switches would have
to be "reset" if handles were used.
Yes, the proposed solution would require one way rotation, but I assume that
this would be simply done given the axle going through the switch.
I was merely providing a solution to the original problem as stated. I'm not
saying it is a fabulous, or the best, but it does meet the requirement of two
three way switches.
I have not come up with a good pneumatic solution yet, but I'm thinking about
it!
Kev
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction. Steve (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
