Subject:
|
Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:42:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1357 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > On Tue, August 23, 2005 12:37 pm, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:
> > > You could also link the handle holes of the polarity switches with a solid piece
> > > (as opposed to a single linking axel through the axel holes). You should be
> > > able to get a 45 degree tilt this way also.
> >
> > Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of
> > friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the
> > proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction.
> >
> > Steve
>
> So - tilting one of the switches is probably the best approach.
Well, given that technic is quantized down to stud or half stud sizes, the
solution may not be obvious.
The easiest angles to create are due to 3-4-5 triangles. Most of the bent
liftarms are bent based on those angles.
The tri-blade liftarms (available in Gigamesh) give you a nice 120 degree angle,
and can be combined to give you 60 degree angles.
45 degree angles are not so simple. Do you have a solution in mind? I know
that one of the bent liftarms supports 45 degree angles, but they can be kind of
gangly.
>
> But I want to know where Brian Davis is. He started this blasted discussion :)
Me too!
> Bryan
Kev
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Actually, I was working on this very thing (45 degree angles) for a new GBC module over the weekend. (you remember GBC, don't you? You know, the creature that wouldn't die :) - thanks Steve for such a wonderful way to waste all my free time :) (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) I'm here - just amazed at the chaos I kicked up :-). Incidently, I've grown to hate those tank tread belts (those, originally, were going to be the conveyor, but they are just too stiff). I've now got more ideas running around in my head as to (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) So - tilting one of the switches is probably the best approach. But I want to know where Brian Davis is. He started this blasted discussion :) And, Kevin, should I just send you my mailing address so you send me the parts? :) (BTW - it didn't (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
