Subject:
|
Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:37:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1290 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> This means gears, but gears mean play. One should be able to cancel the play by
> using a total of four gears. One gear for each switch, and two intermediate
> gears. If you "pre-stress" the gears (take out the slack when you put the
> second intermediate gear on, the 45 degrees should be reliable.
>
> Otherwise the percentage innacuraccy goes down as the number of teeth get
> larger.
Actually, I am not convinced it means gears. One of the switches could be
mounted with a 45 degree tilt. This would remove the issue of play in the
gears.
You could also link the handle holes of the polarity switches with a solid piece
(as opposed to a single linking axel through the axel holes). You should be
able to get a 45 degree tilt this way also.
And, can I have a gorilla mascot too? :)
Bryan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Linking via the handles would cause problems. First, there is a great deal of friction added to the system when an axle is in that hole. Second, I think the proposed method requires the switches to continue rotating the same direction. Steve (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) My bad! I've not used them much, but when I thought about how they were designed, I realized you are right. (...) This means gears, but gears mean play. One should be able to cancel the play by using a total of four gears. One gear for each (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
