To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23313
23312  |  23314
Subject: 
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:57:14 GMT
Viewed: 
4030 times
  
Steve Hassenplug writes:
http://www.teamhassenplug.org/GBC/

I notice that the spec says "Currently, there is no standard for
physically connecting modules together."  One possibility is for a
module to grab onto the two corner studs of the input bin of the
module to the right, since that's already a given.

That's a good idea, which I don't think has been suggested, yet.  However, that sort
of requires a module to have corner studs...  :)

This module mostly uses liftarms:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1051690

As it turns out, I suspect 90% of the modules will not require interconnection, and
those that do, should be mounted on baseplates, or maybe we can just squeeze them
together with other modules...

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
Steve Hassenplug writes: > (URL) notice that the spec says "Currently, there is no standard for physically connecting modules together." One possibility is for a module to grab onto the two corner studs of the input bin of the module to the right, (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)

94 Messages in This Thread:



































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Different Sensors Available...
12 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR