To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23384
23383  |  23385
Subject: 
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:46:16 GMT
Viewed: 
5519 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:

I'm not exactly sure how many "teeth" = 1 stud, but I know it's not a whole number.

It's exactly 2.5. 10 teeth on a gear rack, divided by 4.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) I'm using two upside-down 1x16 TECHNIC beams to straddle 24-tooth gears on each end (see my great ASCII art below, top-down view, not to scale). I might not even need tension in the chain at all; the tread links slide on the flat bottom part (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) I'm not exactly sure how many "teeth" = 1 stud, but I know it's not a whole number. So, I've found if you can change the length by 1 or 2 studs, and add a few chain links, you don't need to add a tensioner. Steve (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)

94 Messages in This Thread:



































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Different Sensors Available...
13 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR