To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23316
23315  |  23317
Subject: 
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:35:04 GMT
Reply-To: 
Geoffrey Hyde <GDOTHYDE@BIGPONDantispamDOTNETDOTAU>
Viewed: 
7854 times
  
"Steve Hassenplug" <Steve@TeamHassenplug.org> wrote in message

Is there something that a module builder can not do because the standard
is too simple?

Yes.  Currently it's not being able to make turns in both directions with
the hopper feed setup the way it is.  Someone did point out that there would
be a lot of wasted space if there was a large assembly of machines.  I think
standards should be there to be helpful, not cumbersome.

Cheers ...

Geoffrey Hyde



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) That's really not true. As a module builder, you can make all the turns you want. This one makes a whole bunch: (URL) you can't figure out how to put the output in the correct place, with respect to the input, that's not a problem with the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) Is there something that a module builder can not do because the standard is too simple? Steve (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)

94 Messages in This Thread:



































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
9 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR