Subject:
|
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:07:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4674 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> Hidden somewhere on the page above, it says I can suppily you with soccer balls.
> Thanks to Christina, I have exactly enough to suppily EVERYONE with soccer balls.
> If I run short, I'll just talk with Larry... :)
Who will promptly tell you to talk to Nik. They're his, not mine. However I
CERTAINLY will be advising him to hold out for good space parts in trade. :)
I might have to see if we can build one or two of these, seems like good fun. I
might even try to see if I can use the MOST RCXs... since the least (0) has
already been done.
To the point of standards extension, I guess I would argue that just getting
this to work right the first (massively public, I know Steve and friends did
this already) time suggests that sticking to type I the first go might be a good
approach. If some wizards want to try their hand at 90s or 180s or
splitters/joiners that's all well and good but if they do not get into the
layout, so be it.
That's my view anyway. Not that I have a lot of street cred here.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| (...) Hidden somewhere on the page above, it says I can suppily you with soccer balls. Thanks to Christina, I have exactly enough to suppily EVERYONE with soccer balls. If I run short, I'll just talk with Larry... :) And, for the record, the you are (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
