Subject:
|
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:45:42 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
tmassey@obscorp&spamless&.com
|
Viewed:
|
4682 times
|
| |
|
|
Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> wrote on 01/10/2005 12:03:04 PM:
> Steve Hassenplug writes:
> > http://www.teamhassenplug.org/GBC/
>
> I notice that the spec says "Currently, there is no standard for
> physically connecting modules together." One possibility is for a
> module to grab onto the two corner studs of the input bin of the
> module to the right, since that's already a given.
Or specify that the input bin must have a technic beam at the front edge
of the input bin to accept technic pins: this is very similar to how the
castle walls connect...
Tim Massey
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| tmassey@obscorp.com writes: > Or specify that the input bin must have a technic beam at the front edge > of the input bin to accept technic pins: this is very similar to how the > castle walls connect... Excellent idea. What do you mean, though, by (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| Steve Hassenplug writes: > (URL) notice that the spec says "Currently, there is no standard for physically connecting modules together." One possibility is for a module to grab onto the two corner studs of the input bin of the module to the right, (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
