Subject:
|
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:03:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1465 times
|
| |
|
|
> I agree with you, Rob. That said, to start, Steve and Co. have their little
> thing goin' on, and I just wanted to point out that, within the parameters as
> layed out by them, one has toe potential to make a module that would work both
> as a straight thru as well as a 90 degree turn to the right.
I didn't think about this until lunch, but you'll note this little yellow modules
conforms to the spec, and works very well as an 90 degree turn to the left, and
could also turn right:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1049778
In fact, it may be interesting to see someone build a "splitter" that handles balls
different, until it fees them into the next output bin (where they are again
combined)
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| news-gateway@lugnet.com wrote on 01/10/2005 01:03:08 PM: (...) little (...) beyond 32 studs can be used as right-turns. It's just as obvious (once Steve points it out, that is) that modules that do *not* extend into the first 32 studs (besides the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| (...) Wow. Mondayness for me as well. I agree with you, Rob. That said, to start, Steve and Co. have their little thing goin' on, and I just wanted to point out that, within the parameters as layed out by them, one has toe potential to make a module (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
