Subject:
|
Re: RIS 3.0
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:45:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1629 times
|
| |
|
|
"Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HK05nw.1Lnu@lugnet.com...
> "Rob Hendrix" wrote:
> What baffles me is why Lego never made a rotation sensor
> based on a potentiometer. It would be low cost (since it is
> passive) and offer much better resolution than the current
> rotation sensor for applications requiring <270 degrees of
> rotation.
rot sensor based on potentiometer can wear out
but active mouse ball - like sensor will never loos it's parameters
that's why i think they made that
br
pixel
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RIS 3.0
|
| (...) power (...) What baffles me is why Lego never made a rotation sensor based on a potentiometer. It would be low cost (since it is passive) and offer much better resolution than the current rotation sensor for applications requiring <270 degrees (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
