To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 21052
21051  |  21053
Subject: 
Re: A better full adder!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:09:51 GMT
Viewed: 
764 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
> Brian H. Nielsen wrote:
> >    While working with Mark's full adder design, the XOR gate in particular, I
> > found something which may be useful in some pneumatic constructions.
> 
> Egad!  Another madman joins the fray!  ;)
> 
> >    In Mark's fulladder http://www.members.shaw.ca/markt1964/fulladder3.jpg
> > consider just the XOR gate (the 3 switches on the piston on the right).  There
> > are actually 3 outputs from the XOR gate.  The bottom switch outputs AND, the
> > middle switch outputs XOR, and the top switch would output NOR if it weren't
> > plugged up.  These 3 functions are mutually exclusive and one and only 1 will
> > always be true.  This can be used to retract pistons attached to the outputs
> > whose values are false.
> > 
> >    Setup just the XOR gate and connect each output to the expansion port of a
> > piston.  Now, with the 3 pistons in compressed mode connect the 3 compression
> > ports all to the same T, forming a closed system on the compression ports.  Now
> > when the XOR gate is pressurized one piston will be forced to expand and create
> > positive pressure in the other pistons compression ports causing them to
> > retract.
> 
> Am I misunderstanding you or are you suggesting that the pressure
> created by the expansion of one piston would actually be sufficient to
> compress *TWO* others?   Unless the pistons had no loads at all, I'm not
> sure if that would really work.

I think the idea here is that they are mutually exclusive - only one will be
expanded at any one time, so when a different one is expanded, it effectively
only has to retract one other - the one that was previously expanded.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A better full adder!
 
(...) Egad! Another madman joins the fray! ;) (...) Am I misunderstanding you or are you suggesting that the pressure created by the expansion of one piston would actually be sufficient to compress *TWO* others? Unless the pistons had no loads at (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

27 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR