|
In lugnet.technic, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
> I realized this afternoon that I could cull a switch from my earlier
> design. It's now down to 12 switches from 13. 4 switches ganged onto
> each piston.
>
> The wiring schematic is here:
> http://www.members.shaw.ca/markt1964/fulladder2.jpg
Great job Mark! Isn't it great when those optimizations just hit you?
>
> Instructions on how to interpret the diagram can be found in an earlier
> thread entitled "The latest rage in pneumatic computing".
>
> > > Mark
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: A better full adder!
|
| (...) It sure is. Thanks. Using the same pattern (setting up specific switches "backwards"), I can do a half adder with two pistons and 4 switches (2 switches on each piston). Again, no need for inter-piston bracing, just the requirement that a (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | A better full adder!
|
| I realized this afternoon that I could cull a switch from my earlier design. It's now down to 12 switches from 13. 4 switches ganged onto each piston. The wiring schematic is here: (URL) on how to interpret the diagram can be found in an earlier (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
27 Messages in This Thread: ![A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Riley (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (26-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (27-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (27-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (28-Jun-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Brian H. Nielsen (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Ross Crawford (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Brian H. Nielsen (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Brian H. Nielsen (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Brian H. Nielsen (2-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Mark Tarrabain (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A better full adder! -Kevin L. Clague (1-Jul-03 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|