Subject:
|
Re: Announcing LegWay, Finally
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:49:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1046 times
|
| |
|
|
> Even if there weren't however, that wouldn't change the fact that
> the range sensors (light or otherwise) cannot tell the difference
> between the ground being tilted and the robot being tilted. You
> need gyroscopes or accelerometers (or a horizon finder) for that.
Actually, you can look at the rate of change. As the surface is tilted, the
robot would start to fall as it tries to maintain a distance. Then, the
rate of change will increase, so it will compensate by moving the other
direction (return to vertical) until the rate of change and motor output are
both zero.
LegWay continually recalculates the 'balance point'.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Announcing LegWay, Finally
|
| Steve, Please, please, publish the source code !!!! A lot of people here are wondering about these mysterious algorithms !!!! Everyone whoes agree please reply to this message ;-) - Christophe - PS: Just for fun, why not thinking to : - a LegWay (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Announcing LegWay, Finally
|
| (...) There's some difficulties with hooking 4 analog sensors up to a single RCX. ;-) Even if there weren't however, that wouldn't change the fact that the range sensors (light or otherwise) cannot tell the difference between the ground being tilted (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
