To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 1334
1333  |  1335
Subject: 
Re: Robotics in Aussie
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:11:40 GMT
Original-From: 
CyberUser <CyberUser@mksftwre.demon.co.[stopspam]uk>
Viewed: 
1129 times
  
I agree with Laurentino. I am very impressed with the Cybermaster. I was
also originally worried that it had been trimmed down, but the more I
experiment with it, I realise that the only loss is possibly the more
advanced sensors.

I now see the Cybermaster as an evolutionary improvement over the
Mindstorms, as radio control IMO is better than IR. You don't need to
download the firmware either.

It must be difficult for the shops too, not knowing how many of each to
stock. I wonder if they have been keeping the Cybermaster quiet so as
not to affect sales of Mindstorms.

Dennis

In message <4.1.19981211102804.00a11f10@195.61.90.220>, Laurentino
Martins <lmartins@marktest.pt> writes
The cybermaster is just about to be released, but
the mindstorms seems so much greater.
can anyone tell me if [CyberMaster] is worth AUS$400 for a
CyberMaster or should I wait for the MindStorm

I've found out that a CyberMaster is worth every penny of it! :-)
I'm very happy with it, since it goes with my tendency to make vehicles instead
of more static bots.
Also, it's radio link makes it possible to use the "higher intelligence" and • the
flexibility of the PC into the CyberMaster almost like if it was CyberMaster
based!!
Also, the integrated Tachos are one of the things those who have a RCX will
never get close to have with the rotation sensors (Tachos have much better
resolution).
The drawback of the CyberMaster is the memory limitation, something stops
worrying you the moment you learn how to make the PC "think" for the
CyberMaster.

Resuming:
CyberMaster is *great* for making vehicles and with projects that involve the • PC
at runtime.
MindStorms is great with more autonomous bots that work alone. Also, the RCX is
better if you want to experiment with new sensors and want more liberty with
motors.


Laurentino Martins

[lau@mail.telepac.pt]
[http://www.terravista.pt/Enseada/2808/]


--
CyberUser



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robotics in Aussie
 
(...) One quick question, is the Cybermaster software as easy to "hack" as the Mindstorm OS. Any sense in buying both Mindstorm and Cybermaster ? Thanks. -- Kin W. Lau Teaching Associate, Communications And Signal Processing Group, Electrical (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robotics in Aussie
 
(...) I've found out that a CyberMaster is worth every penny of it! :-) I'm very happy with it, since it goes with my tendency to make vehicles instead of more static bots. Also, it's radio link makes it possible to use the "higher intelligence" and (...) (26 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)

15 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR