To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *32339 (-20)
  Re: RCX as a PGP engine
 
I posted this msg. about 10 days ago but as my server was set up wrong it didn't work. sorry for the delay. At the time of posting this i have already seen the movie thrice so I'm about ready. I've recently (a month ago) created a RSA (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
 
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Joseph Woolley writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Ok, so I was wrong about this. I double checked the standard task scheduler, and sure enough, it cycles through the high priority tasks, until all are P_WAITING, then moves (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  max 232 ???
 
I,m in the begining stages od building my handyboard kit. But I seem to be having trouble with the charger card. It was while doing the testing for the max232 serial ic. At first all the test seemed to do okay. Pin#2 was at 9.6v, pin#6 was at -9.7v. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
 
  RE: Vision Command on XP?
 
I got the camera to work by downloading the latest drivers from Logitech. I haven't tried to get the Lego software working with it yet. -----Original Message----- From: Julian Gomez [mailto:jeg@polished...ixels.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Vision Command on XP?
 
Has anyone been able to get Vision Command working on XP? -- What about background checks for politicians? Dr. Julian "a tribble took it" Gomez mailto:jeg@polished-pixels.com ** (URL) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Need help with NQC
 
I just wrote a program and I can't get it to work. I download it to the RCX and it just runs its motors. I look at the display and push on the bumper and it has those little triagles. So it is not hardware because the RCX reads that the bumper in (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: IC4.0 and library files
 
Sam & Victor, Thanks for the prompt replies. I was led astray by the fact that I got a graphic image when I first opened that file (lib_hb_exp.ic). Once I 'cancelled' the image, the needed file text was there. Once again, thanks to the group. John (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
 
  Scout programming
 
I used BricXCC and the USB tower to program the Scout. I was wondering how the programming was done by NQC. Are the Scout and RCX command sets compatible? How so? Or does NQC translate and assemble differently depending on target brick? There are (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: IC4.0 and library files
 
Hi John. There's another file that does it... I think it's an .IC file, but not sure. Since I'm at work, I can't check (No IC), but I found it simply by opening up various .IC files in the Handyboard directory. Eventually I came across a file that (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
 
  IC4.0 and library files
 
I've been experimenting with Interactive C 4.0 and have run into a problem. I am unable to modify the list of files which are downloaded when IC4.0 is initialized. With IC3.2, I simply modify the lib_hb.lis file. With IC4.0, modifying 4.0's (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
 
  Re: Final RFC on next legOS release (would have been legOS 0.2.6)
 
Concerning the name change, call for ideas and a vote, I would suggest that a NEW thread entitled similar to "Call for legOS name change" be created in lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos. The details when worked out and as outlined in the rlswork doc should (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
 
"Stephen M Moraco" <stephen_moraco@agilent.com> wrote in message news:GtKIM4.Gws@lugnet.com... (...) <snip> (...) Sounds good. Now, who would like to provide a second opinion? BTW, as far as intended purpose of the task scheduler... I can see how (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: is it possible to use a polarity switch with a RCX input?
 
(...) full (...) 100 (...) handy. (...) two (...) I'm not very familiar with electronics, but I am wondering whether the combination of two diodes with a resistor could solve the problem. I mean this: when current flows in a certain direction, it (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  Re: Deleting Programs
 
That would be great. Thanks Mark! Obviously, it will be prudent to make some or all of these optional at compile time... but I believe at least half of them are useful for most users. Anyone have an idea of priority on this addition? Should it be (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
 
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Joseph Woolley writes: <snip> (...) This is exciting... <snip> (...) Good work on this! Since you have the config and simple swap we'll need to prove that both versions are still working and I'd like a 2nd opinion (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
 
(...) Sounds good to me, I'll fix them up and put them in as patches. As far as keeping things small they will be able to be excluded at compile time, much like everything else in LegOS. It is probably also a good idea to have all 3rd party sensors (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Deleting Programs
 
(...) I created a user space program which does some of this. I call it "inspector" as it mostly inspects the values of sensors. It also shows the current battery reading and how long the RCX has been on. The UI is pretty simple to use. It also (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Final RFC on next legOS release (would have been legOS 0.2.6)
 
(...) Since there has to be a name change, perhaps keep the numbering for continuity? Unless you think we should go direct to 0.3.0 :-) Max. (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  lugnet: list admin question
 
hi everyone, sorry to bother you all with a list admin question: does anyone know how to get hold of a human list administrator? i searched at the lugnet website and could find none. i sent email to the website feedback address and have received no (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Shrimp Rover
 
(...) Hi! I'm really glad you noticed it. Your shrimps' gave me the inspiration. Without you mine would have never existed. Thanks a lot. -Brian (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR