| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) The site isn't 100% finished yet. But thank you for your thoughtful responce, and we'll be making the site better in the days/weeks to come. -Lenny (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Kevin Blocksidge wrote: -snip- (...) Then how about loosing the "piss and vinegar" approach and being nice for a change. Then we can honestly congradulate you all for your fine efforts. e (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Well the "Best Ever" thing was rather a joke, but I'll let it slide... What I would do is first think hmm this is rather interesting, what are these hexagons for? Then I'd put my mouse over them and note the color change. Each hex has a (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Why should I do that? They're just hexagons - they don't say what they're for or where they go. You mean I should just click stuff willy-nilly when it's not clear what it's for? If the point of a web site is to disseminate information, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Could stand to be dialed down a bit IMHO. (...) This isn't .space... try less smack, doofus(1). Smack is out of place in .publish... and a lot of other places on LUGNET too, unless you're sure it's friendly banter. See the ToS if you're (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
Thanks for the nice reply, Kelly. (...) Yep, this is already in the works. We just need to actually build the bots to go in the hex's (Lenny already did his : (URL) ) (...) It is up to each builder, but I imagine I'll link to Lugnet/CSF threads when (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Although I too spent some time at WPtS (I'm a web guy), I really liked the clean design of neutronbot.com. And of course the MOCs are incredibly great. Nice work you guys! I do have some suggestions - feel free to take them as you wish. But I (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Well that is really a shame. You'll miss out on some really rad MOCs. Oh well, can't have everyone like a site. But I do find it absurd that you couldn't figure out in 30 seconds how to get past the front page. It's not that difficult, dude. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Me too. ;] James, thanx for the link to "Web Pages that Suck," it's great! I spent about half an hour there reading stuff. By contrast I spent 30 seconds at the subject site of this thread... :( KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Try clicking one of the hexagons, silly. (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
Ahh, (URL) Mystery Meat> navigation at its best/worst! I'm sure there are some cool things there, but all I see on the front page (in Firefox 1.0) is 7 hexagons. Nothing tells me what to do. Oooh, if I mouse over the hexagons they change colors! (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
| | NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
Some of you may have already seen it, as both Lenny and Roy have posted MOCs linking to it, but here is the official announcement... Presenting (URL) NeutronBot.com> A new website created by six amazingly awesome individuals. We are all outrageously (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.space, lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish, FTX) !!
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
"Rob Antonishen" <rob.antonishen@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:IAMK2z.KpL@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) inner (...) not (...) to (...) (URL) ie> and (URL) firefix> (...) and (...) I had some time last week when I was traveling to work on this (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
(...) FWIW- I have grabbed snaps in (URL) and (URL) firefix> I see differences in the table title, and the displaying of parts 445, 446 and 2875 around the xref box. -Rob A> (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
"Constantine Hannaher" <channaher@netscape.net> wrote in message news:IA51Cr.1JIo@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) very much (...) Gecko as (...) My computer has been down for the last couple of days so I apologize for the delay in (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
(...) heheheh. What a funny statement :) (Sorry, don't know much about CSS, but I know that it probably renders as it should in Gecko and has problems in IE :) FUT .geek, since I'm not really adding any value to the publish thread. (Doh! am I going (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
(...) This article by Eric Meyer may be relevant: (URL) this thread seems to discuss a similar issue, and the last post is very much my own opinion on the subject of developing first in IE then treating Gecko as if it was the problem rendering (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
(...) Mike, I sorted out a problem similar to this on the LDraw site. The problem lies in the fact that IE implements W3C CSS standard loosely. If you email me your code I think might be able to work with you on a solution. -Orion (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | CSS Problem, looking for ideas.
|
|
I have been working on a new version of my Carolina Train Builders web site (www.carolinatrainbuilders.com) and have run into a CSS difference between IE and Netscape and FireFox. I am hoping that someone here might have a suggestion for me to try. (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | fibblesnork.com???
|
|
A couple of days ago, I stumbled across this site: (URL) this a valid site? Or do I have some trojan? It looks suspiscious to me. If I click the link, I get 'search for: lego, legos, bionicle and 'jewish dating' (???) amongst other things. IIRC, (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|