Subject:
|
Re: Legal problem--Use of 2x2 brick as icon?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 05:42:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
709 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G6MI14.A1D@lugnet.com...
[snip]
> We've seen that protecting their trademarks is VERY
> important to them, for obvious reasons - as fans respecting that is one of the
> best things we do, and it probably goes a long way.
Whoops. That last line should read '...one of the best things we can do...' --
forgot the 'can.'
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legal problem--Use of 2x2 brick as icon?
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G6MHC7.8t7@lugnet.com... (...) Ok. (...) Understandable. I believe that I implied that a 2x2 image _not_ displayed prominently as a logo was OK, which before your comments on the backgrounds is (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.publish)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
