Subject:
|
Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:17:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
912 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote:
> Since you know so much about this, can I ask another follow-up question?--
> Is ™ "safer" (i.e., more likely to show up as the TM symbol) to use
> than ™ ?
I would expect ™ to be just as likely to work as ™ today. I
expect ™ to be phased out sometime, but I don't know when (it might
happen with NC5.0).
> How big is that in relation to the regular capital letters T and M in that
> typeface? And is it raised above the baseline?
You can see the rendering of
<P>
T M ™ --- ™ T M<BR>
<P>
[tm]=™
at <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/temp/trademark_symbol>. It looks like NC
substitutes the trademark symbol with [tm], if it can't find it in the
current font.
Play well,
Jacob
----------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/> --
----------------------------------------------
LEGO: MOC+++c TO+++(6543) TC+++(8880) AQ+++ BV-- #++ S LS++ A-/+ YB72m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | ™ ™ and [tm] woes
|
| (...) Oh, man, I see what you mean now. I can't believe how braindead Netscape 4.61 for RHLinux/Gnome is under the default install. Not having the actual tm symbol is one thing, but it actually converts it to a 4-byte character string!! :-( BLYECH! (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
