Subject:
|
Re: The next lego legend
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 May 2002 01:52:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1272 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
>
> In lugnet.pirates, Jackie Tang writes:
> > Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake
> > at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I
> > said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by
> > Lego.com and is the only one I have. I just noted that 6286 is another
> > more giant one! Very sorry about that.
> >
> > So among all, 6285, 6286 & 6289, what is ur priority of preference?
> >
> > Mine is (1) 6286, (2) 6289 and (3) 6285. (Bear in mind I only got 6289 and
> > therfore my comparision is probably biased.
> >
> > Envy so much you guys having able to get these great fleet when they were
> > released in the 90's!
> >
> > P.S. Before I always think that there is not much room for building your MOC
> > for pirate ships as compared to castles. But I have to say that I was wrong
> > after I visited Tom Reed's pirate site.
> >
> > Jackie
>
> Since it exists elsewhere - whoa, way back as Pirates message 315, you can
> read my rankings (and undoubtedly others if you follow the thread).
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/pirates/?n=315
And mine can be seen here:
http://www.mindspring.com/~ffilz/Lego/pirate-ships.html
(and also in reply to Bruce's post mentioned above), but my website has
a more recent ranking.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The next lego legend
|
| (...) Since it exists elsewhere - whoa, way back as Pirates message 315, you can read my rankings (and undoubtedly others if you follow the thread). (URL) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
