Subject:
|
Re: The next lego legend
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 May 2002 09:32:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1556 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.pirates, Jackie Tang writes:
> Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake
> at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I
> said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by
> Lego.com and is the only one I have. I just noted that 6286 is another
> more giant one! Very sorry about that.
>
> So among all, 6285, 6286 & 6289, what is ur priority of preference?
>
> Mine is (1) 6286, (2) 6289 and (3) 6285. (Bear in mind I only got 6289 and
> therfore my comparision is probably biased.
I would rank them this way: (1) 6286, (2) 6285 (3) 6289. The 6289 was my
first large ship to purchase. I can understand why you might prefer it at
the moment. Wait until you build your first 6286 or 6285! Those are great
models to put together!
>
> Envy so much you guys having able to get these great fleet when they were
> released in the 90's!
If it's any consolation, I never owned a lego set until 1998! I also envy
those who had access to the great sets in the 80's and 90's! Isn't it great
that Lego is helping with bringing back some of those sets?
>
> P.S. Before I always think that there is not much room for building your MOC
> for pirate ships as compared to castles. But I have to say that I was wrong
> after I visited Tom Reed's pirate site.
Wow! Thanks again for the praise, Jackie! -Tom
>
> Jackie
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The next lego legend
|
| Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by Lego.com and is the only (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
