Subject:
|
Re: The next lego legend
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 May 2002 22:56:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1249 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.pirates, Jackie Tang writes:
> Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake
> at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I
> said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by
> Lego.com and is the only one I have. I just noted that 6286 is another
> more giant one! Very sorry about that.
>
> So among all, 6285, 6286 & 6289, what is ur priority of preference?
>
> Mine is (1) 6286, (2) 6289 and (3) 6285. (Bear in mind I only got 6289 and
> therfore my comparision is probably biased.
>
> Envy so much you guys having able to get these great fleet when they were
> released in the 90's!
>
> P.S. Before I always think that there is not much room for building your MOC
> for pirate ships as compared to castles. But I have to say that I was wrong
> after I visited Tom Reed's pirate site.
>
> Jackie
Since it exists elsewhere - whoa, way back as Pirates message 315, you can
read my rankings (and undoubtedly others if you follow the thread).
http://news.lugnet.com/pirates/?n=315
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The next lego legend
|
| Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by Lego.com and is the only (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
