 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
(...) Hmmm...you've got a point there...I guess It's an issue of both of the topics above, one being 'how many members would remain', and the other being the 'membership price'. I don't think an annual fee would be bad. I could easily afford $25 a (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gsv03y.HtD@lugnet.com... (...) leadership (...) be a (...) members (...) to (...) Hi Scott, Add me to the list of those wondering the same thing. -- Jason King LugNet #665 (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
(...) I think many of us agree. So why aren't we paying? In my case, I just keep meaning to. I bet there's a lot of that. (...) It would. But $25 per year is something that _any_ North American teen who is well off enough to enjoy LEGO and computer (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
(...) I wonder what the subscription fee would be if we wanted to pay somebody to run this show FT? What would the "going rate" be if an individual from the USA was employed? I really doubt 1500*$25 ($37500) would be enough? Scott A =+= Have you (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
(...) Personally, I think that the notion that a major message board can remain friendly is naïve at best. A "message board" like LUGNET is the juxtaposition of people of many cultures, ages, interests, as well as different levels of experience with (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
You are right Chris a higher membership fee would probably help Lugnet in someway. And I would be more than happy to pay. The enjoyment i get from LUGNET is definately worth it.. However some of our members are still teenagers and they might not be (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Revelant? To what? To whom? You? (...) My concern is with your post. So somebody highlighted it? So what? Why do you feel as if you need to somehow micro-manage behavior on LUGNET? You probably would have had a coronary a while back when folks (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Funny, very funny. Isn't it against the TOS to throw in nasty comments. (...) Fine. Be as negative as you want. There's no need to add more negativity to Lugnet as it is. Use your time more wisely. I, for instance don't spend 10 out of 11 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A Request
|
|
(...) Why? If you don't mind me asking... (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | LUGNET's Good Health was: [Re: Lugnet's tailspin]
|
|
note: I happened to pick this post of the thread to respond to, for no better reason than it just came up on my ticker. As for some people calling this 'a tailspin', well, even if I were to agree (which I don't), you'd better keep in mind that this (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
