People : 3030


People / 3030

Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Jason King
Hi Frank, It's funny you know, last night before I even read your post, I was thinking that the problems began around the time Todd stopped be involved in LUGNET... You are right Leadership is the answer but I can't see where that leadership will (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

	Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Christopher L. Weeks
	(...) So maybe it's time for us to ante up. I wonder how many of the ~1500 members would stick around at $25 per year? Everyone (myself included) should remember this web page: (URL) do I find the amount of my membership fee that I still owe?) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

		Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Dan Boger
		(...) go to (URL) member number> and click on "edit profile". at the very bottom, you will see how much you said you'll pay, and how much LUGNET got. Dan (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

		Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Jason King
		You are right Chris a higher membership fee would probably help Lugnet in someway. And I would be more than happy to pay. The enjoyment i get from LUGNET is definately worth it.. However some of our members are still teenagers and they might not be (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

			Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Christopher L. Weeks
			(...) I think many of us agree. So why aren't we paying? In my case, I just keep meaning to. I bet there's a lot of that. (...) It would. But $25 per year is something that _any_ North American teen who is well off enough to enjoy LEGO and computer (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

			Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Paul Hartzog
			hey this is a great idea worth looking into in my opinion -paul (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

		Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Scott Arthur
		(...) I wonder what the subscription fee would be if we wanted to pay somebody to run this show FT? What would the "going rate" be if an individual from the USA was employed? I really doubt 1500*$25 ($37500) would be enough? Scott A =+= Have you (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

			Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Jason King
			Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gsv03y.HtD@lugnet.com... (...) leadership (...) be a (...) members (...) to (...) Hi Scott, Add me to the list of those wondering the same thing. -- Jason King LugNet #665 (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

			Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Matt Hein
			(...) Hmmm...you've got a point there...I guess It's an issue of both of the topics above, one being 'how many members would remain', and the other being the 'membership price'. I don't think an annual fee would be bad. I could easily afford $25 a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

			how much is enough? —Paul Hartzog
			(...) well, first of all, some of that $ would go to server costs. but you could pay a number of 'volunteers' the equiv of part-time pay above and beyond their day-jobs. 1) you get better results from the 'employee' (or they get fired) 2) you get (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

		Useful URL! —Lindsay Frederick Braun
		(...) Dunno, but I sent something. Just to feel like I'm giving something back. Thanks for the URL--I didn't know it was there! Now, if only I could find a job that paid more than $15K... ...and for the record, I'd ante up $25 a year, even living (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)

	LUGNET's Good Health was: [Re: Lugnet's tailspin] — Suzanne D. Rich
	note: I happened to pick this post of the thread to respond to, for no better reason than it just came up on my ticker. As for some people calling this 'a tailspin', well, even if I were to agree (which I don't), you'd better keep in mind that this (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general) !!