To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.richlugOpen lugnet.org.us.richlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / RichLUG / 62
61  |  63
Subject: 
Re: Possible April Brikwars (was Re: The meeting was fun)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.richlug
Date: 
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:31:13 GMT
Viewed: 
3322 times
  
I agree on the castle bit.  A more open defensive position may be better.  I
bought some troops today for middle ages type combat.  I need to get some
guns to upgrade them to musket troops if I want to play civil war or
napoleonic campaigns.

Who is interested in playing so we can get sort of a head count?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy D. Freshly" <timfreshly@shaheenlaw.com>
To: <lugnet.org.us.richlug@lugnet.com>
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Possible April Brikwars (was Re: The meeting was fun)


> I could bring my castle again, although it may not be the best for • Brikwars
> (no, I'm not talking about durability either!).  I may be wrong, but I was
> thinking that a more wide open keep might be best, both for access and
> maneuverability (ours, not the minifigs).  My castle interios is pretty
> cramped as far as moving figs around.  I also doubt that we would want to
> use the interior because we would forever be pulling out the interior
> sections to move people and then replacing it for the next turn (repeat ad
> nauseum).  Perhaps a hinged castle/castle wall creation would be better.
> 
> On another tangent, a Civil War era game sounds like a lot of fun too - • you
> still have calvary, etc. and the weapons aren't "too" accurate and
> destructive ("too" being a relative term, of course).
> 
> Tim
> 
> "Rich Schoonover" <rwschoonover@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:002501c0a318$10130b40$72ddbfa8@earthlink.net...
> > I like the Castle idea.  There could be defenders in the castle and
> > intervening reinforcements outside the castle.  There could be many ways • to
> > play the game.
> > The middle ages would be a great way to play and it would be a good • first
> > game.  Did you want to bring your castle Tim?
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Timothy D. Freshly" <timfreshly@shaheenlaw.com>
> > To: <lugnet.org.us.richlug@lugnet.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: Possible April Brikwars (was Re: The meeting was fun)
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > "John Kornhaus" <jkornhaus@xperts.com> wrote in message
> > > news:020320011121166614%jkornhaus@xperts.com...
> > > > In article <006901c0a179$75676900$8244f7a5@earthlink.net>, Rich
> > > > Schoonover <rwschoonover@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I think we should keep it simple.  Probably like king of the hill • or
> > > > > something for the game.  We should probably decide on what theme • we
> > > want.
> > > > > Do we want modern weapons or medieval weapons.  It doesn't really • matter
> > > to
> > > > > me.  I don't have much as it is.  I wouldn't mind using swords and • battle
> > > > > axes though.
> > > > > What do you guys think?
> > > > 
> > > > Medieval BrikWars would be a nice change and should solve the
> > > > too-powerful vehicle problem. I've never had a chance to try out the
> > > > close combat rules, most of my troops are toast before they can come
> > > > into range for hand-to-hand fighting.
> > > > 
> > > > john
> > > 
> > > A medieval campaign would present different strategic challenges as • well.
> > I
> > > was just reading an article in National Geographic about Alexander the • Great
> > > and it described his victory over Darius, King of Persia, just north • of
> > what
> > > is modern day Baghdad in Iran.  Great tactics by Alexander but they • would
> > be
> > > useless against anything like modern guns.
> > > 
> > > Ideas for a medieval setting: seige (of course); forest battle; army • to
> > army
> > > combat on a plain; and an invasion-in-progress (invaders already • inside
> > the
> > > castle, defenders must rally to defeat).  Others?
> > > 
> > > Tim
> > 
> > 
> 



Message has 1 Reply:
  I'm in (was Re: Possible April Brikwars...)
 
"Rich Schoonover" <rwschoonover@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:003301c0a370$e0...ink.net... (...) I (...) [snip] Count me in. Tim (26 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Possible April Brikwars (was Re: The meeting was fun)
 
I could bring my castle again, although it may not be the best for Brikwars (no, I'm not talking about durability either!). I may be wrong, but I was thinking that a more wide open keep might be best, both for access and maneuverability (ours, not (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)

15 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR