Subject:
|
Re: Progress on Ore Dock
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Sep 2001 04:00:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
483 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> Looks pretty good Kai. One suggestion though, try saving the picture in a
> picture editor to decrease file size. 618K is a really big, a 6 min load for
> me at home.
>
> As far as specifications go, I think 27 bricks is already to high. I am pretty
> sure we were going to have a drop of 22 bricks. Now if the Ore Dock is
> supposed to be higher than the surrounding landscape, then that's cool.
>
> -Jason Spears
If it is too tall then I will shorten it due to the fact I want to be able
to run my ore cars on there. But one thing for sure is that I am going to
have to widen it to accommodate 2 or 4 tracks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock
|
| (...) I can see two, although I would argue it will be plenty dominant with just 1. But 4 tracks is way too many. The throat will take up too much space. Remember, selective compression... Why do you want to widen it? Docks often have slight grades (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Progress on Ore Dock
|
| (...) Looks pretty good Kai. One suggestion though, try saving the picture in a picture editor to decrease file size. 618K is a really big, a 6 min load for me at home. As far as specifications go, I think 27 bricks is already to high. I am pretty (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
