To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 258
257  |  259
Subject: 
Creating a GBC for a train layout
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:16:23 GMT
Viewed: 
6602 times
  
We were talking about this off line, and I'd like to continue this discussion on-line.

We're trying to figure out how to make a GBC that looks like it should be part of a
train layout.

John wrote:
> Well, I guess I'll add my thoughts.
> 
> 1.  I agree with Brian D. in that high-quality modules should be able to run
> unattended for a couple of hours without failing.  In my mind, a dropped or
> missed ball does NOT count against this so long as it doesn't cause the
> module to break.

Right.

> 2.  As for making the modules look like they work in a factory or city
> setting, I think a minimum would be for a "control room" for the module with
> a minifig or two "controlling" the module.  I think my pneumatic digger
> would have qualified as would most of the modules at this link, though some
> of them were a little sparse on decorations.
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=149883 (not sure whose
> gallery this is, but it is of our modules in the last IndyLUG layout)  Most
> of us don't have the required number of windows, doors, fence pieces, etc.
> to make it fit perfectly into a layout.  I like Dave K.'s idea of painting
> the soccer balls grey and making them look like rock chunks, but I'm not
> sure that is the best solution to make them fit into some sort of theme.
> All we have right now is "soccer ball factory", I don't know if there is
> something better.  I think an industrial zone/ factory setting is perfect.
> It allows us to have more mechanicals parts showing without them looking
> totally out of place.

The problem is actually getting paint that will stay on for any length of time.  I
have many balls where the real spots are worn off.  Then, is the act of painting
them.  That won't be easy.

> 5.  Above grade-- This sounds like it would be FANTASTIC, but pretty tough.
> But I do think that neatly routing wires would be a MUST.  How many of us
> have the necessary bricks to "brickscape" our modules to either raise the
> grade or hide all the ugly components?

I'm thinking you can build a hill in your module, if you want.  That's up to you...  :)

> 6.  Like we talked about yesterday, I would still like to see a GBC train
> traveling through the main train layout and moving off onto a siding to
> unload/load.  Whether it be a single all-in-one loading/unloading module or
> individual stations that maintain the ball supply to a larger GBC.

Yes.  This would be the plan.  Imagine a big train layout with a GBC train running
through it.  There would be a few automated stations where the train(s) would stop,
unload, load, and move on.  At the station would be a predefined set of GBC modules.

Out past the end of the train layout, there could be a "normal" mix & match GBC,
where others can contribute modules.  The GBC train could shuttle balls to that, and
back.

> 7.  Also it has been discussed having some sort of force-feedback joystick
> controlling a GBC crane module of some sort so passers-by can control the
> action to some extent.  When not being controlled, it would revert to
> autonomous control.  I like this idea (I'm taking partial credit for it
> since Steve, Kerby, and I dreamed it up on our way back from Ft. Wayne).

I like this (and want to do it), but it's the kind of thing that may end up in the
"GBC" section, not the "Train" section.


> 8.  Bryan, I don't think you'd have to be worried about having Steve (or
> somebody else) setting your module aside because it wasn't pretty enough.
> If we do this, I think it would be a relatively few people involved
> and I would guess lots of pictures/ layouts/ helpful
> suggestions would be flying to and fro.

Yes, the "Train GBC" area would require a great deal of advanced planning, while the
other area will work as it has in the past. (modules are added when they arrive)

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Creating a GBC for a train layout
 
(...) Agreed. (...) Yes. I've got this on most of my modules, but would develop it a lot more for a train layout. At ChiBots I even had one minifig who had fallen off of the top level, and was being held over the roiling ball stream below only by (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

14 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR