 | | Re: Indy 5.00 rule clarification
|
|
(...) The Internet? (...) I'll keep that in mind. That really isn't my intention, but you know, rubbing is racing! (...) Good, I'm guessing I'll be making use of this. How much "changing" before it becomes a whole new robot? "But I used the same (...) (18 years ago, 1-May-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Indy 5.00 rule clarification
|
|
(...) I think the internet was to keep people from using a wedge-shapped bumper to push people out of the way. So, while bump-drafting is allowed, if you use the angled part of your bumper to push someone out of the way, that could easily be (...) (18 years ago, 1-May-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Indy 5.00 rule clarification
|
|
(...) No wonder! Just from the back, that looks very nice. Wish I was closer (time is tight this year). (...) I suspect the studs tend to make for a slightly less aerodynamic surface than desired. I'm beginning to think about Indy 5.00 + Sumo for a (...) (18 years ago, 1-May-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Indy 5.00 rule clarification
|
|
I think this has been permitted in the past, but I can't remember if we decided if it shouldn't be encouraged or not... The Indy 5.00 rules state that "The bumpers must be perpendicular to the robot's direction of motion, not 'angled'." Does this (...) (18 years ago, 1-May-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | [LafLRC Meeting]
|
|
There will NOT be a LafLRC meeting this weekend (Easter). It will be next Sunday, April 23rd. We'll have pratice for our Indy 5.00, and bring your GBC modules. Indy rules: (URL) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
(...) Do I have to mention how much I am loving bylaw B??? Whooohooo for the two X chromosomes! Awesome management skills there, I am re-organising my list of "Most Favourite Lugs" as we speak and Laflrc just took a huge leap in the list. Janey "Red (...) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
(...) snip (...) will you take a cheque? (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Coming up...
|
|
Here's the official schedule of upcoming events: April 16 - meeting MOVED off Mothers day April 23 - LafLRC meeting @ the Community Family Resource Center April 27-29 - First Lego League World Festival in Atlanta May 7 - LafLRC meeting - first round (...) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
(...) I've been meaning to talk to you about this. Our bylaws require all members to pay their full membership fee at the first of the year. Membership fees are waived under a few specific circumstances like: A) Member has purchased a lifetime (...) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
(...) I know... THATS what i meant. ~ALL~ of lugnet. its my special gift.(2) (...) humm, let me take a stab at this... i see a game.. something original... something never before discussed.... how about tug of war? Chris LAFLRC member # 42 1/2 (1) (...) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
(...) I think you killed ALL of Lugnet: (URL) been talking about tons of stuff at our meetings. The next month will be very busy. I'll be posting something soon. Steve (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | This place is dead - where are all the cool posts?
|
|
Hello? anyone here? anyone? Buller? Buller? Where is everyone? Chris Proud LAFLRC- member # 42 1/2 (18 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Tic Tac Toe Results
|
|
(...) So to clarify, if the games were a draw and no touches were needed, the winner was the one with the lowest time. But if even one touch was needed, a slower robot that was better at block placement would win (because it didn't need a "touch"), (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Tic Tac Toe Results
|
|
So, we've been playing with Tic Tac Toe for a couple months. Of course, at the same time, several of us have been working on other stuff, as well. We finally had our Tic Tac Toe event yesterday. It was a very cooperative event. Every robot played (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) Thanks for checking. I hadn't gotten a chance to set up a test yet. I inferred that would be the result from what I read in the help, and the actions of the program I've been using, but it is (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) well, I sit corrected. I ran this VERY CRUDE program, and it would seem that a STOP TASK should stop the task mid task. feel free to mess with var x, to see it the resuts change. program generic { var a = 0 var b = 0 var c = 0 var d = 0 var e (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) as a mindscript guy, i cant say i've had this problem. i ~think~ the STOP TASK command stops the task at the END of that task. not mid task when the STOP was called. (1) If i wasn't busy with a R20 robot I would code a quick test to test for (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) Ok, that makes some sense, thank you very much. I hate the thought of nesting that many more if statements, but that does appear to be the best way to solve the problem. Thanks John (18 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Actually, John, I think I may be able to explain the problem. You have two tasks running at the same time. For the most part, the processor will switch between the main task, and the scan tast. So, the order of execution would be something (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Brian Davis wrote: <snip> (...) I don't know if I'm using the most efficient method either, but from what I have found... Tasks are run in parallel. If I start a task (the scan task) my main code will continue to run at the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
