 | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) Yes, as was Operation Free Beverage. Good one, Chris. Just short of being slightly obnoxious, but at least we got free drinks :) (...) And you're not used to spelling either :) (...) I'm working on it. (...) Yeah, I think we're going to have (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) bla bla... (...) ... (...) Has the rules page been updated to reflect these new diagrams and standards? There are those of us who live in another country, and can not attend the monthly dinners, so we don't really know what's going on with (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| man, it's quite here, today. What are you people doing, working? I know Calum doesn't want my input in the rules, but that's really not going to stop me. Just so he doesn't get too mad, I'll try not to mispell any words... While sitting here at (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) This is problematic. It forces the arbitrator to have to signal as well as listen. I think the arbitor should just start it's clocks when the first robot signals. So because red goes first timing will start when the red player signals it has (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | RE: final rules.
|
| (...) man, it's QUIET here.... (...) You already did. And you even misspelled mispell...sheesh (...) The first robot should not make ITS first move.... The possessive form of it is its, not it's. This is probably the most common grammatical/spelling (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) When I wrote it, I had to look that up, just to make sure I misspeled it correctly... :) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) If it's decided that the arbitrator does not automaticly signal, then a touch sensor could be added to the signal line, which starts the match. Then, the lucky person going first, doesn't also get 1 free turn. But, actually, I think it could (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) You just have to signal the first robot to start. Possibly through hitting run, or whatever method you choose. It then signals the completion of its first move. This starts the clocks. There is no advantage to sitting around contemplating an (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) Deliberately? Calum (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) You may be surprised how easily this could happen. The simple act of pressing the button, and holding it, could cause more than one "signal" to be sent. In mechanical switches, you can get some "bounce" when opening or closing the it. Like (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) Your point here is valid. We do need to experiment with the signaling wiring and procedure. Potentially we could say any press and releases in a 2 second period count as one. Your turn is automatically 2 seconds long. It's tricky we need to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) Do the control labs have 2 inputs and 2 outputs? Can you just hook one in & out together, and say that is the signal line for one robot? (then do the same for the other?) Then, when one signal is received, the control lab sends out a signal on (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: final rules.
|
| (...) Couldn't you achieve the same end result by using just one sensor port? And signal EoT by changing the port from Passive to Active and back? (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
