Subject:
|
Re: The portlands below altenburg
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:24:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1022 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writes:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Elliott writes:
>
> > I'll bring part of my station to the dinner tonight. (Don't worry - it
> > fits inside a shoebox with room to spare!)
>
> So, I wanted to mention this at dinner, but didn't get around to it, and all
> of a sudden, only Technic people were left... :)
>
> The layout is getting too large. We need to cut it down in size quick, or
> we'll have a lot of unused space which looks bad. Is there any way we can
> reduce the number of modules? That's a LOT of scenery to build to high
> quality (ie, we want to be like MonLUG quality) and density. I'm worried
> there won't be enough buildings and more importantly detail if new sections
> are put in.
>
> Calum
hey,
we're already star, were's my limo ;-)
Calum is rigth here, the important is not the size but quality of the layout.
Anybody with a bunch of peace can do a layout in no time, no effort,... But to
do a realy good one is a lot more rewarding.
Martin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The portlands below altenburg
|
| (...) So, I wanted to mention this at dinner, but didn't get around to it, and all of a sudden, only Technic people were left... :) The layout is getting too large. We need to cut it down in size quick, or we'll have a lot of unused space which (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
