Subject:
|
Re: robot building....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:20:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
593 times
|
| |
|
|
"Ivan Louch" <ivn@idirect.ca> wrote in message news:GsFMvD.Fnx@lugnet.com...
> Well if you really want to get technical, then first of all the • measurement
> should've been in meters, not millimeters. And secondly it's 0.008m^3 and
> not 0.2m^3, unless you meant to say "A cube with sides of 0.2m"
> c'mon Iain don't embarrass us SI types ;))
I meant to "cube" (^3) 200 mm. I didn't mean it to read as I had typed it.
My mistake!
I used millimetres because that's the fundemental unit that is used in
Engineering (or at least, in my little experience).
> IMHO you should seek professional help ;)) Dreaming about blue Duplo's for • 2
> bucks a bucket and licking rear windows on Montreal subway isn't normal.
Oh, trust me, I know. But Psychatrists are stupid. My first one had a
DeLorean (spelling?), which was cool. I think we ended up talking about her
stories with her DeLorean than we did talking about why I wanted to die. LOL
> LOL, This is too funny
I know! I've been laughing at myself for years.
Iain
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: robot building....
|
| (...) Well if you really want to get technical, then first of all the measurement should've been in meters, not millimeters. And secondly it's 0.008m^3 and not 0.2m^3, unless you meant to say "A cube with sides of 0.2m" c'mon Iain don't embarrass us (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
