Subject:
|
Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:16:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
412 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Stehlik writes:
> > > "In my mind a robot that needs 2 rcx to make one tower is only half as
> > > good as a robot that can do the same tower in 1 rcx."
>
> Sorry. I just wanted to bug you dual RCX users. I guess I succeeded in
> bothering Bruce :) I wasn't trying to change the rules. I'm surprised Chris
> didn't jump on this, since he is the one who said it :)
>
> > Whoever said that was clearly wrong...Coding complexity increases with the
> > number of RCXs.
>
> Yes, probably very true. I have had my second RCX for over a year now, and
> still haven't tried communicating between them. I really should do that some
> day.
I recall someone talking about this at the last dinner, the conversation
went something like this.
Me: I only have one RCX
Someone: Well since I'm only using 3 RCX's I'll lend you one of my extra one..
Kid in background: Hey Mister...
Me: But then I have to learn to communicate between RCX's
Someone: IT'S ONE LINE OF CODE!!!
Jeff VW
>
> > > Just teasing,
>
> Rob
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
| (...) Sorry. I just wanted to bug you dual RCX users. I guess I succeeded in bothering Bruce :) I wasn't trying to change the rules. I'm surprised Chris didn't jump on this, since he is the one who said it :) (...) Yes, probably very true. I have (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
