Subject:
|
Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:31:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
409 times
|
| |
|
|
> > "In my mind a robot that needs 2 rcx to make one tower is only half as
> > good as a robot that can do the same tower in 1 rcx."
Sorry. I just wanted to bug you dual RCX users. I guess I succeeded in
bothering Bruce :) I wasn't trying to change the rules. I'm surprised Chris
didn't jump on this, since he is the one who said it :)
> Whoever said that was clearly wrong...Coding complexity increases with the
> number of RCXs.
Yes, probably very true. I have had my second RCX for over a year now, and
still haven't tried communicating between them. I really should do that some
day.
> > Just teasing,
Rob
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
| (...) I recall someone talking about this at the last dinner, the conversation went something like this. Me: I only have one RCX Someone: Well since I'm only using 3 RCX's I'll lend you one of my extra one.. Kid in background: Hey Mister... Me: But (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
| (...) Baah! more than 1 RCX communicating via anything is for people who can't handle doing everything you need to do on 3 outputs and 3 inputs! Bunch of wussies who think they need 6+ ports. The *real* engineers do the same job with a minimalistic (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
| (...) see, this is just the kind of mis-quoting that got me in trouble at U of T and the stupid Varcity. What kind of a "reporter" calls me at my home @ 7am and asks questions about St. Mikes policy. the best i did was GRUNT... next day the papers (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: remember the 1/n rule?
|
| (...) Whoever said that was clearly wrong...Coding complexity increases with the number of RCXs...a good robot is much more than just an extra motor or an extra sensor. Should we change the scoring to be based on number of ports used? This would (...) (22 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
