Subject:
|
Re: Official scores from rtl21--Chris didn't win... again!!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:22:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
721 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys wrote:
> What's it like to lose all the time, Chris?
>
> You beat me? You beat a 'bot that was made basically the day of the
> competition??
>
> Eh--here's the breakdown--
>
> 13 competitors--78 match-ups...
>
> tied for first place--Edward and John G--they both won 11 of their 12 matches
> second went to Vitali--winning 9 out of 12 matches
> Ka-On was third, winning 8 matches and tieing 1--yes, an actual tie score!!
> Rob A was fourth, winning 7 matches and had a tie game against Ka-On
> Calum won 6 matches, placing him in fifth (and with a higher score than Chris)
> Sixth place was tied--both Trevyn and Chris won 5 matches out of 12
> Seventh place was again tied--Derek and Dave K won 4 out of 12
> John/Ian's 1.5 kg 'bot won 3 matches, putting them in 8th
> Finally, tied for 9th were Tomer and Glen, winning 2 matches each.
>
> The good bit here was that no one lost all matches. That was great.
>
> The other good bit was that Chris was no where near top spot.
>
> One more good bit was the weight restriction--I had to build a 'bot that I
> wasn't used to--small and light. We should definitely do this again.
>
> A further good bit was the 'anti-x' yippage in this NG which got me thinking
> about nifty ways to build a tug-o-war 'bot. One should not be taunted into not
> building by Chris--rather use it as an incentive to actually build a 'bot to
> whup his heinie--I only built a 'bot due to Chris's yippage.
>
> One thing we should consider, and I think I've stated this before--we should
> re-run some competitions the next time so we can improve our designs and
> such--coming up with a different competition each and every time for an rtl
> event is fine and all, but what I learned from this one I will not be able to
> apply to building a better tug of war 'bot 'cause there won't be a next time. I
> mean, sure for monkey bars it was not a great idea to rerun it 'cause of Rob's
> 'bot, but this one--I think I can buld a 'bot that would beat Edwards and
> John's...
>
> But I do go on sometimes...
>
> Anyway, all told a very fun event.
>
> Dave K
I PROTEST!!!!!
if this was a real game organized by competent people, then the
following would have happened.
John G - Disqualified for re-building his bot once he saw that other
bots had a strategy to defeat his bot.
Ed- Disqualified for needing to use the Extra rope.
Vitali - Disqualified for thinking the posted table length of 60" was real.
Iain/Jon - Disqualified for an over weight robot
Dave - Disqualified for an over weight robot.
that would make me the clear winner over those who entered a bot and
DIDNT get disqualified.
All that counts is that I BEAT up your robot, and Derek's and Rob's.
and... I think someone else.
Would it kill you to post the graph?
:)
it was a good game. I agree with Derek, if we re-do this, then most
people would build a hook bot, and a winch. We would need to re-do the
rules so that those bots would either be useless, or people would find a
better secret weapon.
how fun would it be to have 13 people enter hooks. it would be a day of
watching tables be pulled together.
Good game guys. Thanks.
Chris
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
