| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
> If we are using that png.file, (assuming alpha across the top, and lettering
> down the side) can all the issues not be solved by the rise starting at the
> bottom of M-11 running up 4 bricks per plate (2 for each house) levelling
> out at plate G-11 and holding that altitude through plate F-11 and E-11
> (which clears both outer tracks and the gutter train.) At that point, the
> inner track will enter a tunnel at C-11/D-11. Where the cliff edge covers a
> fair part of the "train yard" at top elevation yet is exposed at the bottom
> elevation with plenty of clearance (keeping in mind this is a cliff which is
> concave, not a mountain). It was never my intention to enclosed both the
> outer and inner loop with the cliff, just a tad bit of the inner. That
> leaves a huge top section of the cliff for not only the (whatever name you
> gave it) separate loop, but also some real-estate for Jeff to add some
> buildings. Unless I am failing to see something..... which more then
> likely I am.....this more like a 24 brick elevation, Which means, raising
> the gutter track by one more ramp to clear trains, the gutter train will not
> block much of the Sanfran run but does leave it totally exposed on the run
> and at the far end loop. Yes? Maybe?? No...?
>
>
> Janey "Was this post even in English? Red Brick"
Wow, one long sentence. Hope this looks better
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: No one asked...
|
| (...) If we are using that png.file, (assuming alpha across the top, and lettering down the side) can all the issues not be solved by the rise starting at the bottom of M-11 running up 4 bricks per plate (2 for each house) levelling out at plate (...) (20 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
