| | Buddhism
|
|
I'll adopt Bens Zen state-of-mind to answer this question: (...) And illusion? Perhaps
But if the group collectively embraces it, it becomes our reality. And in this organization we dictate the state of the matrix. Therefore, if we should so (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Here's one 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) It displays all groups to which the message will be posted in the authorisation mail. They're above the actual message, on a line titled "Newsgroups" (...) They're already there, as well. Right up the top. Though many people (including myself, (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Richard: In some ways, yes, but I see your point and it is a valid one. I'm glad SOMEONE is defending free speech, even though the TOS is clearly stated. I also had a good chuckle-you're a funny guy, I liked your immediate response to Tim :) (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | return to Zen on rtl Toronto
|
|
oh well, let's get to the subjects at hand..... we (as a local lego group) have to busily prepare for the next two events... Train 3, which is just over 1/2 a week away..... and Robotics 10.... that should keep everyone busy.... so let's get back to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Because of the web interface, what you or anyone else say in "your" NG is hardly private. Many if not most view any post no matter which NG it's in. You may think you "get away" with stuff, but that's only an illusion. -John (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Thats EXACTLY- how I felt! Whyd Tim have to Five-O u on such a minor statement? He could of just ignored it and let it pass. (Its not like the whole newsgroup was about to be spammed by lewd-anagrams!) This just totally wastes Suz (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) HA, Dave, that's GREAT news. congratulations!!!! :) Of course as you have stated we both have LOTS of time to make the robot faster. I've got a few more timing tricks up my sleeve to try to speed things up. I've been in discussion with a few (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) hey Bro, all you had to do was remove the lugnet.general newsgroup from your posting....that would have saved everyone from trouble... Ben (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|