To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / *16684 (-20)
  Re: TTT - Question
 
(...) I don't agree with Chris a lot, but I would say yes too. We want to encourage well tested and reliable robot hardware. I also agree with Steve's criteria for a definition of marked by having a light circle of dots to define where solid marking (...) (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: TTT - Question
 
(...) I would say yes. and since dave, and derek, cant post here anymore. I get there votes too. so YES a bad move is a loss. Chris (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: [welcome to rtlIndiana]
 
(...) tell ya what... leave me rtlToronto, and you can HAVE hamLUG. heck they are WAY closer to you than that pesky Toronto place. I here good things come from Hamilton. tell ya what I'ma gonna do. Order NOW, and I will throw in ParLUGment. but (...) (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)  
 
  TTT - Question
 
Would a bad move equal an immediate loss? For example, if my bot failed to mark a square but signalled it was done, would that be an immediate loss? -Rob A> (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  [welcome to rtlIndiana]
 
(...) Sorry, that was the last straw. We're declaring that we are overthrowing the government of rtl. That's right, this is a hostile take-over. In this time of organizational turmoil, the leadership of LafLRC has decided (by a majority) to take (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: [Official Announcement!!!]
 
(...) YES I have the post to the group in the draft folder. then it will just be ME. and then I will finally WIN an RTL game. Chris (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: [Official Announcement!!!]
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: Serious snippage. (...) Uh... Chris... is that a threat to Calum? What are you trying to do, get him to renounce his own official affiliation? Janey "Red Brick" (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: [Official Announcement!!!]
 
(...) Well said dave. here ya go: [Announcement] ATTENTION WORLD - Please let it be known that one Mr. Dave Koudys, and Derek Raycraft has expressed to the group in a public post that they no longer wish to participate with rtlToronto. (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: {Official Announcement!!!}
 
(...) > > < A lot of very good points. > > (...) Just like David, I'd like to renounce my affiliation with rtlToronto as well. I sight the same reasons. I think David really hit the nail on the head here. Derek (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)  
 
  {Official Announcement!!!}
 
From the desk of Dave-- Maybe it's cause my website's down and I'm in Cornwall, Ontario (over 5 hours from getting home and giving that ##W#@W% desktop a swift kick), but I'm making an official proclamation... I hereby renounce my official (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto) ! 
 
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) Isn't that library opening till 1:00pm? Derek (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Announcement was Re: So... ummm....mm....
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) You didn't put the [] brackets in the Subject--isn't this an 'official' rtl leader post? Don't official rtl leader posts always have the [] brackets in the Subject? Or are the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Announcement was Re: So... ummm....mm....
 
(...) Chris, Thanks for posting this. It helps us target our search for new out-of-town members. Steve (URL) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  rtl23: reducing your parts count?
 
[Warning: this is OT for even this OT post] (...) Given your day job, a brand new rtl game springs to mind[1]. So, jumping ahead... rtl23: "Tamp the Blasting Cap". Or "Eve of Destruction"... or "Test to Failure"... or "The REAL C4 Challenge". What (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Announcement was Re: So... ummm....mm....
 
(...) You are right. I should have done something when I had heard that you privately e-mailed Calum to be removed from the rtl web page 2 months ago. So here goes. [Announcement] ATTENTION WORLD - Please let it be known that one Mr. Greg Hyland has (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)  
 
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) So, that's something I want to ask--should there be a dedicated time during the day of the event which is a demonstration time? Calum (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: So... ummm....
 
(...) Well, foolishly, I thought losing members might actually concern you. Obviously not. My mistake. -Greg (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) I like that! Have the first bot to play draw the grid! -Rob A> (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
As long as it fits on the page it doesn't really mater to me. I think it looks better smaller and I was going to have my bot draw the board for playing with the kids. Derek (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) The reason why I think we might want two is because of even versus odd spacing. I can't explain it, I just think an odd line space would make it more difficult. Calum (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR