 | | Re: Along with everything else...
|
|
(...) I know this would take a little bit more work, but what about a simple maze that 'bots could just go though? Then it's something that could just be 'on' all the time, or most of the time, and it's interesting. Navigating a maze is something (...) (19 years ago, 24-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Along with everything else...
|
|
I was thinking for the hobby show, since we're having many wonderful yet pretty much 'static' displays, that we might want to add to it... Such as, say.... SUNDAY!!! SUNDAY!!! SOMEDAY!!!! EXTREMECROSS 2!!!!!!! (VROOM!!!) (VROOOMMM!!!) How 'bout I (...) (19 years ago, 24-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
(...) On the plus side, at least they didn't advise you to contact the IT department if you have any connectivity troubles... (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) WHY? at max, 10 robots at 12" will only ever fill at MAX, all lined up in a row, just over 1/10th of the play area. thats TONS of room. no. i think we can leave it at 12" knowing that only you and Steve will build to the full 12" (...) i think (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) If we can maybe think about limiting the size to 10 x 10 x 10, or even 8x8x8 (though that might be tough), there'd be much more room on the playfield. Though if the 'bots are 12x12x12, we'd just have less 'bots at one time--smaller orgy... So (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) omg!! LMAO!! John, thats funy. Chris (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) i second this. BAM. (gavel noise) OK, so its agreed, Rob A is NO LONGER allowed to spawn offspring. Chris (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) Agreed. Play it by ear. Maybe have a couple of rounds, with increasing number of bots in the field? (...) Let's say I build 2 robots, and they are designed to find/mate with each other easily. So they mate. And have a smoke afterwards. But (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) GOD NO!!! -Rob A> (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) I guess it comes down to what's more important, the competition or getting together to watch robots mate. Without even considering bots working together, a game where dumb luck is important, running more then one bot definitely increases your (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) 10 was just a number. we can change it on the day (...) my GUT FEEL on this is: it allows someone to make and test a robot that is best suited to mate with the second (or third) robot entered thus giving them an advantage i can be convinced (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
(...) Sure (...) Sure (...) Sure (...) Hmm, this might be a little cramped. Lined up perfectly the robots take 1/6 the total play area. I'm picturing a 8 bots jammed in a corner and one or two bouncing around in the remaining open space. But it's (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | rtl 20 - mating rules
|
|
so i guess the slience of the group mean we are ok with the last statements? -12" cubed -as yet to be decided HITW input WITH several stud width as part of design. -5 min game -10 bots on the play area at once -multiple entries will be discouraged, (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
(...) Well at least you get Presidents Day off. Derek (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
(...) Right now I wouldn't be surprised... But eh, names are changed to protect the innocent :) :) -just doing what you told me to do Dave K (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
(...) They needed internet because the meeting was called "What Dave Writes About Us on LUGNET." I hope it went well. (insert smiley face made with colon and bracket here) -Greg (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) btw, this posting was brought to you by the letter 'e' and the group 'space'--you wanna talk about supposed non-sequiter postings on LUGNET??? eric, you keep right on doing what you (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | I Loooooove IT professionals
|
|
(considering I am one...) So the e-mail I received-- - - - We will be using <blah> for IT all meeting tomorrow (09/22 - 1-3PM CST). You will need to have Internet access and telephone line to attend this meeting. Details for Net connectivity <blah> (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Iain needs set up on LUGNET help
|
|
(...) no, no joke. thanks. Chris (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Iain needs set up on LUGNET help
|
|
g'day i think you would just go to (URL) . or am i missing some inside joke here? cheers oliver Play Well. "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:In651x.M8C@lugnet.com... (...) (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
