Subject:
|
Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:36:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1107 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys wrote:
>
>
> If we can maybe think about limiting the size to 10 x 10 x 10, or even 8x8x8
> (though that might be tough), there'd be much more room on the playfield.
WHY? at max, 10 robots at 12" will only ever fill at MAX, all lined up
in a row, just over 1/10th of the play area.
thats TONS of room.
no. i think we can leave it at 12" knowing that only you and Steve will
build to the full 12"
> Though if the 'bots are 12x12x12, we'd just have less 'bots at one time--smaller
> orgy...
>
> So have we made a decision on the locale of the hole(s)?
i think my moc-up is a good place to start.
the HITW should be 16 studs long (OD) and, 8 studs (ID)
it is 14 "bricks" tall (OD) and 8 bricks (ID)
i suggest the bottom brick of the HITW be placed 4 bricks above the floor.
and remind people that only bricks in your "hopper" should count towards
final score. and your hopper has to be enclosed.
>
> I'll try mocking something up (again)
>
> Dave K
OK. its a date.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtl 20 - mating rules
|
| (...) If we can maybe think about limiting the size to 10 x 10 x 10, or even 8x8x8 (though that might be tough), there'd be much more room on the playfield. Though if the 'bots are 12x12x12, we'd just have less 'bots at one time--smaller orgy... So (...) (19 years ago, 23-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
