 | | Re: Ugh...
|
|
(...) Yes - the entertainment value of LUGNET continues. On the plus side, the Jonny-five robot *is* nice, especially the driver, and the second meeting of the Fellowship of the GBC looks *great* (AAAAaaargh! One Of These Days, I *WILL* make it down (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Ugh...
|
|
(...) It's that time of the month when Calum gets soft. (...) But it passes quickly. Derek (...) Have you seen one in person? (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Maersk Ship
|
|
(...) (URL) I absolutely love it. Calum (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Ugh...
|
|
(...) I saw that last night. Ugh is right. Oh well. I guess this really bothers some people, perhaps more than it does us. (...) That new forklift kicks ass hard! Calum PS-I now agree, the real Ferrari Enzo is an ugly car. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Ugh...
|
|
(...) And, this is what it's like when people try to not talk about my balls. Maybe I'll send some balls to people in the color NG, then, let's see what they talk about... BTW, did everyone see the latest video(s) of my balls? (URL) "I still have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Ugh...
|
|
1. Why are you making me look at this crap. 2. After several weeks of amazing MOCs finaly making it into the top stories, we have to go through this crap again. 3. If they are that disparate for crap old gray why don't they just do what Maersk did (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Maersk Ship
|
|
In looking up how to spell Maersk, for my previous message, I realized I never actually looked at all the Maersk sets. 10152 Maersk Ship is nothing. This one is awesome: (URL) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Ugh...
|
|
(...) I did the same this morning .... .....followed by.... <rolling my eyes> ... .....followed by.... <trying not to bang my head against the wall>.... .... so, how about that new large Technic crane ??? or .... how about those round black and (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Ugh...
|
|
I step out of .rtlToronto, .robotics and .technic for 5 minutes and trip over this: (URL) Wow. -Rob A> (climbing back into the safety of his happy place...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve's Ball hanging out at Wendy's
|
|
(...) Personally, I find it kind of exciting that my balls are exposed to new places, but that does bring up another question... Does anyone think my balls are hanging out too much? Not that I'm going to do anything about it, because I really don't (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve's Ball hanging out at Wendy's
|
|
(...) Derek, Why do I get this eerie feeling that this and the last pic is just a small portion of whole series? Instead of the traditional documented minifig travelling to exciting and new places, it will be Steve's balls hanging out in ordinary (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Last dinner
|
|
(...) (URL) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Steve's Ball hanging out at Wendy's
|
|
(URL) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: New Technics parts
|
|
(...) WOW cool, I really want that white Bionicle part, I think I will buy that set for just that piece, and throw away all those silly long pieces with holes along them, and all those links, pneumatics and other strange bits. Whatever could ppl use (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: New Technics parts
|
|
(...) It appears to be a new part, but as those are leaked pictures, the final version may be different. It looks more like it should be in a Bionicle to me... (...) With the weight of the boom, as Iain said, gravity is enough to get it down. If (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: New Technics parts
|
|
(...) GEE, thanks Iain, I ~NEVER~ would have figured that out othrwise. (...) OK, so this is a part to solve for the new studless piston. (...) Gravity? where do you get this? whats the lego part number? (grin) Chris (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: New Technics parts
|
|
(...) I assume that's to keep them ridgid to one another. Without that, you'd have a 4 or 5 bar linkage. It would be floppy and wouldn't push up. (...) cylinders. Because gravity will pull them down? :) Iain (Stackin'! WOOOOO!) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | New Technics parts
|
|
Big thanks to Jeff VW for pointing this out: (URL) was wondering if anyone had insight on the white part that joins the butt's of the 2 pneumatic cylinders?? why would this model only apply air to one half of either of the cylinders. Chris (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Last dinner
|
|
(...) I have one of Steve's balls driving my 8441 Fork Lift here in my office. His ball fits nicely in the cab. The Fork Lift is currently transporting a 3219 MINI TIE Fighter. Derek (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Last dinner
|
|
(...) LOL! SOMEONE? Oh I wonder who did that "Mr. Spilly-Pants"? Janey "Using my best Alexander O'Keefe's pale ale accent, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
