Subject:
|
How to be a STUD Re: Close Encounters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:18:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1129 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
> Personally I didn't see the problem with STUDS as a name. I can see that in
> a general context, it might be construed as being an all-male group who
> think they are God's Gift To Women. However, in the context of Lego, is
> there really a problem? Do we really envisage flyers saying "Come along and
> be a STUD" without ever mentioning the Lego word?
>
> I'd have no problem joining STUDS (if I lived in Sydney). Indeed, I would
> think it a great joke to proclaim myself to be a STUD.
>
> Of course, never having been to a STUDS meeting, it may well be that it is
> an all-male group who think they are God's Gift To Women and Lego
> enthusiasts ...
I think that the studious (NPI[1]) avoidance of any photos of people from
any of our meets should give the lie to the thought that we are paragons of
male form. OTOH we are all pretty keen on Lego (even those of us that sully
themselves by consorting with other brands).
I'd be quite happy to declare you a geographically challanged STUD (a lost
STUD?) but that may be seen as poaching on other people's territory. What do
the Bris/Qld lego people call themselves again?
James (who's quite happy o consider himself a plastic knob.)
[1] NPI:no pun intended; studious, STUDious... give it up James.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) Personally I didn't see the problem with STUDS as a name. I can see that in a general context, it might be construed as being an all-male group who think they are God's Gift To Women. However, in the context of Lego, is there really a (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
