| |
> Does Club 2390 or a variant appeal to anyone else?
Personally I didn't see the problem with STUDS as a name. I can see that in
a general context, it might be construed as being an all-male group who
think they are God's Gift To Women. However, in the context of Lego, is
there really a problem? Do we really envisage flyers saying "Come along and
be a STUD" without ever mentioning the Lego word?
I'd have no problem joining STUDS (if I lived in Sydney). Indeed, I would
think it a great joke to proclaim myself to be a STUD.
Of course, never having been to a STUDS meeting, it may well be that it is
an all-male group who think they are God's Gift To Women and Lego
enthusiasts ...
Kerry
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | How to be a STUD Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) I think that the studious (NPI[1]) avoidance of any photos of people from any of our meets should give the lie to the thought that we are paragons of male form. OTOH we are all pretty keen on Lego (even those of us that sully themselves by (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Close Encounters
|
| Sorry about my sleep deprived crosspostings last week: at least it seemed to boost the .loc.au traffic . I liked the following the best: In lugnet.org.au, David Low snips: (...) Does Club 2390 or a variant appeal to anyone else? --DaveL (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
