 | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) We could all use some Mazel... (1) Cheers, - jsproat 1. Name that play -- my #1 fave. (27 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| Sproat, you mean "craving in"? I hope it's you and not Bam-Bam, unless you were planning on expecting, in which case, Matzeltov;-) [1] -John [1] spell-checker has no idea how to spell it, either:-p (...) (27 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Perl rules!
|
| (...) Yeah, I had a nice discussion on this exact subject a while ago elsewhere. Maintainability is usually more important than efficiency or looking pretty. However, to be maintainable, code has to be written in ways that can be understood easily. (...) (27 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Alors, switch to eine karakter-tabell die sie wohl hat. Jasper (27 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) lungs, (...) seasonings, (...) Actually I think we agree. The descriptor I was slightly disagreeing with was "experience": you might change it to "mistake" or "regret" :) It's amazing the food that's been invented by folks in tough times. Who (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) Well, ya. Which descriptor were you struggling with? Tough to chew? That's the stomach part. Now, granted, the person preparing it may not have known all there is to know about the fine art(1) of haggis preparation, but all those descriptors (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) Egads, (...) Actually I meant that you shouldn't miss it like the flu once it's over. (...) From some dictionary, used without permission, but I figured if they really wanted me to know things they wouldn't copyright them ;-) : hag'is n. A (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) BTW, Lar, please note that this entire thread was compleately devoid of my addresses....just some food for thought. But look out, cuz I'M BAACK!!;-) -John (27 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Only about Rapunzel. (...) Hehe "The circle is now complete..." (...) You're invited over for cigars, BTW. (...) And times were lean after that. -Tom McD. when replying, never go rafting down the Colorado river on a spamcake. (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) It would seam sew. (...) Calling them VERY BAD is just repundant. Besides, no one calls them good. (...) Hola, estoy muy bien, gracias. Los symbolicos de las accentas no son presentan en este contrapcion. -Tom McD. when replying, note that (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) And how re-pun-gnant they are. Really, from puny minds. So many people want to take the punt. The result is quite punitive. And what a can of worms which has opuned. (...) A-hola lotta puns. Cheers, - jsproat (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| I'm really touched that so MANY puns have been spawned by my deliberate t7po. But I think what's best about it is how VERY BAD many of them are. Aloha (not to be confused with a-hola).... (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Wool-d you mind explaining your obsession with these types of puns? It's not healthy, ya know. Well, I suppose it isn't really all that bad, unless you start flaxing poetic about 'em. (...) Or maybe You think faster than you type. (Yes!! Full (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Not and be brief about it anyway. (...) Poi-sonally, I think you could come up with more. (...) Sorry about that. There's a word missing in my question. I think Todd has installed a program that randomly steals words from posts. (...) Jeff (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| <3778ED41.9E590386@g...ities.com> <FE3MD3.EEq@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) And the crowd goes wild. (...) You couldn't cotton the thought of going off-topic, neh? (...) I dunno, I (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) "moo- (...) Encyclopedia Sproaticus comes through again. (Those double-u'ed words really get me. The only ones I really have to remember are vacuum and continuum.) I've never worn one and never seen it spelt. Remember though: any garment, once (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| <FE3ArA.MHz@lugnet.com> <FE3Hy7.8zG@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) *ahem* muu-muu or mu'u mu'u :-, (...) Yes, yes, yes. Well, thank you Tom. There are some who say that a pattern for the (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) You won't regret knowing about one, but probably about seeing one :) If my spelling is correct (and I was almost (but not quite) loathe to spell it "moo- moo") a mu-mu or mumu is a rather single dress-length piece of brightly colored womens's (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) That's snot funny! (...) I'll probably regret this, but what the heck is a mu-mu?? Jeff (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) With an off-the-cuff remark like that, you're a shoe-in for lugnet.potd. Have you been belting out puns for a long time or are you an early bloomer? (...) Just sleeve me alone. Next thing you know, you'll be branding me a name- collar. -Tom (...) (27 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
