| |
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> > 7 206.132.150.129 15.455 ms 11.166 ms 11.553 ms
> > 8 206.132.253.97 16.484 ms 9.011 ms 9.696 ms
> > 9 206.132.151.22 148.602 ms 148.816 ms 161.058 ms
> > 10 206.132.254.41 147.507 ms 144.997 ms 142.788 ms
>
> Lemme see if I got it then, in this example the problem lies either in
> hop 8's outbound processing, the link between 8 and 9, or hop 9's
> inbound processing, because that's where there is a big jump in times,
> between 8 and 9 ??
Yeah, exactly.
Most likely one of the routers is overloaded -- if one checks the dns for the
gateways at 8 & 9, one finds the phrases "155M" and "622M", which seems like
a lot of bandwidth to me.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| (...) Oh, I've been a manager... but I stopped. Didn't like it and neither did any of the people I was managing. *no idea* why, really. LOL... <snipped excellent explanation> (...) Lemme see if I got it then, in this example the problem lies either (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
