To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 3042
3041  |  3043
Subject: 
Re: Sluggish nntp performance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:51:14 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera.com!nospam!
Viewed: 
225 times
  
My subjective observation is that performance is definitely
deteriorating....

Here are a couple of tracerts...

I have blanked out the first two network addresses, my client is
confidential. But with times under 10 ms they may or may not matter
much.

D:\Data\DOCS\Novera\Clients_Prospects\SecretClient>tracert
www.lugnet.com

Tracing route to lugnet.com [209.68.63.236]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  xxxxxxxxxxx
  2   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  xxxxxxxxxxx
  3   160 ms   741 ms   250 ms  38-default-gw.psi.net [38.1.1.1]
  4   631 ms   640 ms   451 ms  38.146.57.1
  5  1222 ms   921 ms    71 ms  rc6.ne.us.psi.net [38.1.41.6]
  6    90 ms   391 ms   280 ms  rc1.ne.us.psi.net [38.1.21.97]
  7   100 ms   110 ms    70 ms  ne.esc.psi.net [38.1.2.41]
  8   470 ms   131 ms    70 ms  204.6.117.6
  9   550 ms   271 ms    90 ms  114.ATM2-0.XR1.EWR1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.176.50]
10    70 ms    80 ms   111 ms  193.ATM2-0.TR1.EWR1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.176.66]
11   260 ms    91 ms   100 ms  105.ATM4-0.TR1.DCA1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.136.185]
12   120 ms   101 ms   100 ms  199.ATM6-0.XR1.DCA1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.161.129]
13   601 ms   581 ms   861 ms  193.ATM8-0-0.GW1.PIT1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.162.81]
14   731 ms   110 ms   400 ms  pairnetworks-gw.customer.ALTER.NET
[157.130.32.178]
15   251 ms   150 ms   100 ms  192.168.1.104
16   130 ms   120 ms   131 ms  lugnet.com [209.68.63.236]

Trace complete.

D:\Data\DOCS\Novera\Clients_Prospects\SecretClient>tracert
www.lugnet.com

Tracing route to lugnet.com [209.68.63.236]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  xxxxxxxxxxxx
  2   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  xxxxxxxxxxxx
  3   671 ms   350 ms   341 ms  38-default-gw.psi.net [38.1.1.1]
  4   200 ms    60 ms    60 ms  38.146.57.1
  5   110 ms   101 ms    70 ms  rc6.ne.us.psi.net [38.1.41.6]
  6   451 ms    80 ms   120 ms  rc1.ne.us.psi.net [38.1.21.97]
  7   651 ms   461 ms   781 ms  ne.esc.psi.net [38.1.2.41]
  8   952 ms   480 ms   151 ms  204.6.117.6
  9    70 ms   371 ms   300 ms  114.ATM2-0.XR1.EWR1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.176.50]
10   451 ms   160 ms    70 ms  193.ATM2-0.TR1.EWR1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.176.66]
11   440 ms   100 ms    91 ms  105.ATM4-0.TR1.DCA1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.136.185]
12   180 ms    90 ms   110 ms  199.ATM6-0.XR1.DCA1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.161.129]
13   100 ms   641 ms   110 ms  193.ATM8-0-0.GW1.PIT1.ALTER.NET
[146.188.162.81]
14   551 ms   240 ms   131 ms  pairnetworks-gw.customer.ALTER.NET
[157.130.32.178]
15   461 ms   290 ms   571 ms  192.168.1.104
16   811 ms   611 ms   561 ms  lugnet.com [209.68.63.236]

Trace complete.

As a point of information, I am physically located less than 30 miles
north of Boston where pairnetworks presumably(?) is located. But
physical location is less relevant than link and box speeds.

Hope this is of some use.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Sluggish nntp performance
 
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote: [snip] (...) [snip] (...) In both of these cases, you're having trouble before you even get out of psinet. That makes the rest of the data irrelevant.... (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Sluggish nntp performance
 
(...) Pair Networks is in Philadelphia. --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Sluggish nntp performance
 
(...) Todd Lehman wrote: (...) Hey, I ain't a networking kind of guy so if what I posted wasn't too much help, so be it I guess... Seemed like a good idea at the time. (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Sluggish nntp performance
 
Has anyone seen slow performance from LUGNET's nntp server? The http server is very fast and nimble, etc. but whenever I connect via nntp, it's always slow and sometimes dropping the connection, whether I use port 119, 8000, or 8080. Cheers, - (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

42 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR