Subject:
|
Sluggish nntp performance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 21:07:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@IOspamcake.COM
|
Viewed:
|
333 times
|
| |
|
|
Has anyone seen slow performance from LUGNET's nntp server? The http server
is very fast and nimble, etc. but whenever I connect via nntp, it's always
slow and sometimes dropping the connection, whether I use port 119, 8000, or
8080.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Jeremy: "Hi, My name is Jeremy Sproat, and I'm a Slashdot Lemming."
All: "Hi, Jeremy."
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
 | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| Yes, I have noticed this for a few days. It takes 7-8 seconds from the time my reader (Outlook Express) says CONNECTED until it downloads new messages and shows the total read/unread. -- Scott Smallbeck scotts@contactics.com (URL) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Sproaticus (<37FE5CFB.54DC1EC8@io.com>) wrote at 21:07:07 (...) It's always been a bit slow for me - but I am on the other side of the Atlantic. One thing which happens regularly, but not consistently, is I don't get the last 2 (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| (...) Something really net.weird is going on today, but I don't see special notices at Pair yet: (URL) I'm seeing when I look inward from the outside is lots and lots of packet drops and broken connections. Yesterday was bad too, but today is really (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| (...) Yeah, I've noticed this, especially the last several days. I've also noticed slowness in general on the net, especially in sites that I go through Sprint or BBNPlanet to get to. But at times when everything else has seemed slow, nntp (...) (25 years ago, 9-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| My subjective observation is that performance is definitely deteriorating.... Here are a couple of tracerts... I have blanked out the first two network addresses, my client is confidential. But with times under 10 ms they may or may not matter much. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
